{"id":57570,"date":"2024-07-02T14:41:47","date_gmt":"2024-07-02T11:41:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/portable-x-ray-fluorescence-analyzer-instructions-for-use\/"},"modified":"2026-05-07T19:55:30","modified_gmt":"2026-05-07T16:55:30","slug":"portable-x-ray-fluorescence-analyzer-instructions-for-use","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/portable-x-ray-fluorescence-analyzer-instructions-for-use\/","title":{"rendered":"Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Analyzer: Instructions for Use"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Portable analyzers are used for geological exploration work. They cost tens of thousands of dollars, but if you don&#8217;t know how to use them, it&#8217;s easy to lose that money.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n<p>The head of the Laboratory of X-ray Spectral Analysis Methods Oleg Nabelkin and leading consulting geologist Elena Ryazanova spoke about how not to discover a barium deposit where there is no trace of it, what elements cannot be measured, how to buy an analyzer and how to handle it.<\/p>\n\n<div id=\"brxe-dhzhok\" class=\"brxe-container\"><div id=\"brxe-dptqfg\" class=\"brxe-block\"><\/div><div id=\"brxe-rzwpbc\" class=\"brxe-block\"><div id=\"brxe-biaboh\" class=\"brxe-text medium-text\"><p><strong>Article partner:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/pvp-snk.ru\/vanta_m?utm_source=geoconversation.org&amp;utm_medium=article&amp;utm_campaign=ryazanova&amp;utm_content=vantam-geo&amp;utm_term=pvpsnkru\">SNK PVP<\/a>, a supplier of portable X-ray fluorescence analyzers. These instruments are widely used in geology for rapid analysis of ores and rocks in the field.<\/p>\n<p><strong>We will customize a solution for your needs!  <a href=\"https:\/\/pvp-snk.ru\/vanta_m?utm_source=geoconversation.org&amp;utm_medium=article&amp;utm_campaign=ryazanova&amp;utm_content=vantam-geo&amp;utm_term=pvpsnkru\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading gc-block-heading\"><strong>X-ray and fundamental parameters<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n<p>A portable XRF analyzer is a device that allows you to quickly determine the chemical composition of a sample. But how does it work? Let&#8217;s figure it out.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-gallery has-nested-images columns-default is-cropped gc-block-gallery wp-block-gallery-1 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large gc-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-1.1.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" data-id=\"4473\" alt=\"Rice. 1.1\" class=\"wp-image-4473\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-1.1-1024x683.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-1.1-1024x683.webp 1024w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-1.1-300x200.webp 300w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-1.1-768x512.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-1.1-1536x1025.webp 1536w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-1.1-1200x801.webp 1200w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-1.1-600x400.webp 600w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-1.1.webp 1707w\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large gc-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-1.2.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" data-id=\"4474\" alt=\"Rice. 1.2\" class=\"wp-image-4474\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-1.2-1024x683.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-1.2-1024x683.webp 1024w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-1.2-300x200.webp 300w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-1.2-768x512.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-1.2-1536x1025.webp 1536w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-1.2-1200x801.webp 1200w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-1.2-600x400.webp 600w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-1.2.webp 1707w\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-caption wp-element-caption\">This is what the result of analyzing the chemical composition of the sample and its X-ray spectrum look like.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading gc-block-heading\">How does X-ray work?<\/h3>\n\n\n<p>Let&#8217;s take the planetary model of the atom. At its center is a nucleus around which electrons rotate in their orbits. X-ray radiation from the analyzer knocks an electron out of its inner orbit. There&#8217;s a hole in orbit! Atom is excited and strives to patch it up. Electrons from higher orbits rush towards it. When an electron jumps to a lower orbit, the difference between the two energy levels is emitted &#8211; an X-ray quantum. This quantum is captured by the analyzer.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>The energy level closest to the nucleus is called the K-level, all transitions to it are called K-transitions, and the lines that we see in the spectrum are called K-lines. The lines at this level are the most intense. The second level from the nucleus is called the L-level, and transitions of electrons to it from upper orbits are called L-transitions, and in the spectrum we see L-lines.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large gc-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-2-scaled.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" alt=\"Rice. 2\" class=\"wp-image-4475\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-2-1024x683.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-2-1024x683.webp 1024w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-2-300x200.webp 300w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-2-768x512.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-2-1536x1025.webp 1536w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-2-2048x1366.webp 2048w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-2-1200x801.webp 1200w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-2-600x400.webp 600w\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">The solid line indicates the orbits of the K and L levels, and the dotted line indicates the M and N levels. Transitions to them are in the long-wavelength range and are not detected by the analyzer.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<p>When an electron descends into a neighboring orbit, the line is called \u03b1: K\u03b1, L\u03b1. When jumping over the orbit &#8211; \u03b2: K\u03b2, L\u03b2. K\u03b2 lines in the spectrum are always 7\u201310 times weaker than K\u03b1, L\u03b2 lines are 1.5\u20135 times weaker than L\u03b1, because it is much easier for an electron to jump from the nearest level to the neighboring one than through a level. The device records precisely the lines K\u03b1 and K\u03b2, L\u03b1 and L\u03b2. The remaining lines (M-, N-level) are too weak, the analyzer simply does not feel them.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>Each transition in an atom of any element is characterized by its own unique energy. Therefore, such radiation is called characteristic.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large gc-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-3.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" alt=\"Rice. 3\" class=\"wp-image-4476\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-3-1024x683.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-3-1024x683.webp 1024w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-3-300x200.webp 300w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-3-768x512.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-3-1536x1025.webp 1536w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-3-1200x801.webp 1200w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-3-600x400.webp 600w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-3.webp 1707w\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">This is what the K lines of iron, zinc, and arsenic look like in the spectra; L lines of gold and others.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading gc-block-heading\">Software<\/h3>\n\n\n<p>Often the analyzer software cannot be changed &#8211; what the factory installed is what we will use. It works using the method of fundamental parameters.<\/p>\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><em>Let&#8217;s take an iron atom. Here it emits, for example, the K\u03b1 line. It is absorbed to varying degrees by both the iron itself and other elements in the sample. For each line of each element there is a constant of absorption by the remaining elements &#8211; this is <\/em><strong><em>fundamental parameter<\/em><\/strong><em>. Therefore, we will have to analyze all the elements in the sample in order to correctly calculate the influence of the elements on each other and give an accurate figure for the iron content.<\/em><\/p>\n<cite><em>Oleg Nabelkin<\/em><\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n<p>Here lies the rub. The analyzer does not know all the elements. We don\u2019t need the entire periodic table, since these instruments were first used to analyze alloys where the set of elements is known. There&#8217;s something the manufacturer didn&#8217;t include. If there is a lot of element in the sample unknown to the analyzer, the device will still not see it, will introduce corrections incorrectly and give an incorrect result. A good example of this is the analysis of metal oxides. The device does not sense oxygen and, as a result of the analysis, the content of any metal in any of its oxides will be equal to 100%.<\/p>\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote gc-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><em>They once brought me a tungsten-rhenium alloy to try on, but rhenium was not included in the factory program. But the device sees some lines! In rhenium, the K-lines of zinc fall exactly into the L-spectrum. So he decided that I had a tungsten-zinc alloy.<\/em><\/p>\n<cite><em>Oleg Nabelkin<\/em><\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n<p>Some brands of analyzers have open calibration. It does not take into account the influence of the elements in the sample on each other, and you need to interpret the spectrum in the program yourself.<\/p>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading gc-block-heading\"><strong>Selecting an analyzer for the task<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n<p>Initially, portable analyzers were produced for the analysis of steel and alloys, where there are only 14\u201315 components, and the sum of their contents is 100%. Later them <a data-id=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/mozhet-li-portativnyj-analizator-obnaruzhit-zoloto-soderzhaniem-1-gramm-na-tonnu\/\" data-type=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/mozhet-li-portativnyj-analizator-obnaruzhit-zoloto-soderzhaniem-1-gramm-na-tonnu\/\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Geologists began to use<\/a> for sorting samples on site, because it is fast &#8211; 30 seconds and you have a spectrum of all the elements in the sample. During the season, based on the results of the analysis, a ditch or pit can be laid.<\/p>\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote gc-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><em>In Chukotka, at a silver-gold object, we measured anomalies recorded in the 80s and 90s. We obtained about 2,000 ore samples. On the spot we examined them for copper, zinc, bismuth, and antimony. About 600 samples that showed anomalous values \u200b\u200bfor these elements were taken to Moscow. Very convenient.<\/em><\/p>\n<cite><em>Oleg Nabelkin<\/em><\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>If you need to analyze alloys or heavy elements, you should select the \u201cAlloys\u201d mode.<\/li>\n\n\n<li>If you need heavy elements, you should choose simple analyzers with a Si-PIN detector: they see from titanium to uranium and can even capture potassium and calcium.<\/li>\n\n\n<li>For the analysis of rocks and ores, there are analyzers with a silicon drift detector (SDD) and pre-installed special calibrations &#8211; \u201cMining\/geochemistry\u201d, \u201cOre\u201d, etc. modes. Such analyzers have the most complete range of elements &#8211; from magnesium to uranium. Light rock-forming elements fall into this range: magnesium, aluminum, silicon, phosphorus, sulfur, potassium, calcium.<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Rhenium, scandium and lanthanides are added in rare earth geochemistry mode. The low content of heavy elements, such as lead, tungsten, cadmium, in the light siliceous matrix determines the soil regime.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large gc-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-4-scaled.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" alt=\"Rice. 4\" class=\"wp-image-4477\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-4-1024x683.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-4-1024x683.webp 1024w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-4-300x200.webp 300w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-4-768x512.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-4-1536x1025.webp 1536w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-4-2048x1366.webp 2048w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-4-1200x801.webp 1200w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-4-600x400.webp 600w\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">When purchasing an analyzer, look at the material of the tube anode and relate it to your needs.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large gc-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-5-scaled.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" alt=\"Rice. 5\" class=\"wp-image-4478\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-5-1024x683.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-5-1024x683.webp 1024w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-5-300x200.webp 300w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-5-768x512.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-5-1536x1025.webp 1536w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-5-2048x1366.webp 2048w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-5-1200x801.webp 1200w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-5-600x400.webp 600w\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">This is not a complete list of modes; there is also a mode for the thickness of galvanic coatings, a mode for lead in paints and others.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<p>If you are going to analyze hydrogen, helium, lithium, beryllium &#8211; forget it. Beryllium can still be measured in a vacuum, but hydrogen, helium and lithium certainly cannot. They are too light.<\/p>\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote gc-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><em><em>Many XRF analyzer manufacturers say they can measure beryllium. I have never seen the X-ray spectrum of beryllium in my life. They argued with me a lot, double-checked it with expensive spectrometers, put in pure beryllium, but didn\u2019t see the spectrum and agreed. Why? Because beryllium is practically transparent to X-rays. This is why most modern X-ray tubes have an output window made of beryllium. And when they come to us and ask us to measure lithium with X-ray spectral analysis, we say: \u201cProbably not in this Universe.\u201d<\/em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<cite><em>Oleg Nabelkin<\/em><\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading gc-block-heading\"><strong>Using the analyzer correctly<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote gc-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><em>There is a joke that a tent burns at a speed of 10,000 rubles per second. And there were cases when the analyzer burned out along with the tent. I think it was burning at a rate of several million per second. There have been cases of drowning. A friend of mine had his analyzer crushed by a bulldozer.<\/em><\/p>\n<cite><em>Elena Ryazanova<\/em><\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n<p>The most common analyzer breakdown is mechanical. The device is afraid of shocks, although it has protection against them. It also has shock sensors, so service engineers during repairs will always know if the device has hit something.<\/p>\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote gc-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><em>I once had a device fail due to shaking in the trunk. I took it apart and the cable just came off. Plugged it back in and everything worked.<\/em><\/p>\n<cite><em>Oleg Nabelkin<\/em><\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large gc-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-6.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"683\" height=\"1024\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 683px) 100vw, 683px\" alt=\"Rice. 6\" class=\"wp-image-4479\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-6-683x1024.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-6-683x1024.webp 683w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-6-200x300.webp 200w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-6-768x1151.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-6-1025x1536.webp 1025w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-6-600x899.webp 600w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-ris.-6.webp 1139w\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">This is what broken detectors look like.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<p>The analyzer window is also vulnerable. It is covered with a thin polypropylene film (Mylar) and protects the inside of the device &#8211; the tube and the detector &#8211; from damage and dirt. The film breaks easily. If it is torn, it must be changed immediately, otherwise the device will not be able to be used. To prevent the film from tearing, the sample should be as even as possible. And don&#8217;t forget to clean the measuring window.<\/p>\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote gc-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><em><em>In 2010, I went to the Subpolar Urals to measure samples. Everything was going as usual, and suddenly the chrome suddenly jumped up on one profile. A grain of chromite got caught between the body of the device and the window film. The spectrum from it fell into the spectrum of the sample &#8211; chromium was everywhere. We realized it in time, measured 20 samples and saw that something was wrong. We blew on the window from above with a syringe, and the crumb flew off. We started measuring &#8211; everything was fine, no abnormal chromium content, as it should be<\/em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<cite><em>Oleg Nabelkin<\/em><\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading gc-block-heading\">How to measure samples<\/h2>\n\n\n<p>Let us repeat once again: choose samples that are as even as possible &#8211; their geometry and tightness to the window affect the measurement results. The tube and the detector are at an angle &#8211; whichever surface you shine on, secondary radiation will enter the detector from it. There may be very little impact, or the radiation may even go in different directions.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>Sometimes the penetration depth of radiation is very small &#8211; fractions of a micron. In this case, in order not to measure only the surface, the sample must be crushed and abraded. Afterwards we take several measurements over the entire surface (many devices have a multiple measurement function) and then average them. This is how we get the average composition of the sample. For bulk samples there are special cuvettes with film.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>The depth of the feedback response that comes to the detector is also very small, so samples cannot be measured through a fabric bag or craft bags. It is better to measure through film, you can use zip bags, but they must be thin and always the same so that the results can be correlated.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>Do not measure wet samples. The content of some elements in them drops by 20\u201330% compared to dry ones. Or, if you still measure wet samples, calculate the correction and add it to the results.<\/p>\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote gc-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><em><em>An incident in the Primorsky Territory with calibration and lanthanides. I did a calibration and warned that it would only work up to 2% barium. \u201cOh, where does the barium come from? This is not the same object at all!\u201d And then: \u201cWe found ore, we have already laid a ditch.\u201d They send spectra, and there are solid lines of barium. Due to the mutual superposition of barium lines on the analytical lines of rare earth elements, cerium, praseodymium, and neodymium were overestimated. Up to two percent, this overlap was taken into account by the calibration, and if it was more, then all these elements were already overestimated. This is how a barium ore occurrence was discovered and the ditches were not laid for what was required by the geological assignment<\/em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<cite><em>Oleg Nabelkin<\/em><\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n<p>If you are buying a device for a specific long-term task, collect samples with known contents, measured by stationary methods, from the object you will be examining. Come and carry out an analysis on the instruments that are offered to you to solve this problem. If the results agree within 20-30%, this can be considered a semi-quantitative method, then everything is fine. You will be able to correctly lay the ditch, the ore, and reject abnormal samples.<\/p>\n\n\n<pre class=\"wp-block-preformatted gc-block-preformatted\">! Portable XRF analyzers cannot provide quantitative analysis. The State Committee for Mineral Resources does not accept results from this device for calculating reserves.<br\/><\/pre>\n\n\n<div aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer gc-block-spacer\" style=\"height:20px\"><\/div>\n\n\n<p>And finally, don\u2019t forget to regularly service your analyzer.<\/p>\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote gc-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><em>It is recommended to carry out maintenance of analyzers before each season, or after a season, or once a year. We are looking for internal errors &#8211; software, temperature, settings errors, etc. We disassemble and completely clean the analyzer.<\/em><\/p>\n<cite><em>Elena Ryazanova<\/em><\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-gallery has-nested-images columns-default is-cropped gc-block-gallery wp-block-gallery-2 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large gc-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-analizator-i-pochva.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"683\" height=\"1024\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 683px) 100vw, 683px\" data-id=\"4470\" alt=\"Analyzer and soil\" class=\"wp-image-4470\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-analizator-i-pochva-683x1024.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-analizator-i-pochva-683x1024.webp 683w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-analizator-i-pochva-200x300.webp 200w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-analizator-i-pochva-768x1151.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-analizator-i-pochva-1025x1536.webp 1025w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-analizator-i-pochva-600x899.webp 600w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-analizator-i-pochva.webp 1139w\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large gc-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-analizator-i-kern.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"683\" height=\"1024\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 683px) 100vw, 683px\" data-id=\"4469\" alt=\"Analyzer and core\" class=\"wp-image-4469\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-analizator-i-kern-683x1024.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-analizator-i-kern-683x1024.webp 683w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-analizator-i-kern-200x300.webp 200w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-analizator-i-kern-768x1151.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-analizator-i-kern-1025x1536.webp 1025w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-analizator-i-kern-600x899.webp 600w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-analizator-i-kern.webp 1139w\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large gc-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-oleg-s-analizatorom.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"683\" height=\"1024\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 683px) 100vw, 683px\" data-id=\"4472\" alt=\"Oleg with an analyzer\" class=\"wp-image-4472\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-oleg-s-analizatorom-683x1024.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-oleg-s-analizatorom-683x1024.webp 683w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-oleg-s-analizatorom-200x300.webp 200w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-oleg-s-analizatorom-768x1151.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-oleg-s-analizatorom-1025x1536.webp 1025w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-oleg-s-analizatorom-600x899.webp 600w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-oleg-s-analizatorom.webp 1139w\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-caption wp-element-caption\">Portable analyzers at work.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading gc-block-heading\">Checklist before purchasing an analyzer<\/h2>\n\n\n<p>Nevertheless, portable analyzers help to quickly obtain the chemical composition of samples and adjust geological exploration work without waiting months for results from the laboratory, especially in the summer, when laboratories are overloaded.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n<p>We have put together a checklist of what to do before purchasing an analyzer \ud83d\udc47<\/p>\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Formulate the problem &#8211; what elements need to be analyzed,<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Find out the geological situation at the site &#8211; rocks, ores, element contents,<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Contact a consultant for calibration,<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Train employees to operate the device.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We examined the operating principle of analyzers, their types and the subtleties of handling them.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":4489,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"10","_seopress_titles_title":"Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Analyzer: Instructions for Use","_seopress_titles_desc":"The operating principle of geological exploration analyzers, their types and application during geological exploration work","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[560,581],"tags":[],"tag-cat":[595,596],"class_list":{"0":"post-57570","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-exploration","8":"category-geology","9":"tag-cat-exploration","10":"tag-cat-geology-and-geophysics"},"acf":[],"pbg_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-oblozhka-1.webp",1707,1139,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-oblozhka-1-150x150.webp",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-oblozhka-1-300x200.webp",300,200,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-oblozhka-1-768x512.webp",768,512,true],"large":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-oblozhka-1-1024x683.webp",1024,683,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-oblozhka-1-1536x1025.webp",1536,1025,true],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-oblozhka-1.webp",1707,1139,false],"bricks_large_16x9":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-oblozhka-1-1200x675.webp",1200,675,true],"bricks_large":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-oblozhka-1-1200x801.webp",1200,801,true],"bricks_large_square":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-oblozhka-1-1200x1139.webp",1200,1139,true],"bricks_medium":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-oblozhka-1-600x400.webp",600,400,true],"bricks_medium_square":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/geoconversation.org-oblozhka-1-600x600.webp",600,600,true]},"pbg_author_info":{"display_name":"Elizaveta Akimova","author_link":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/author\/elizaveta\/","author_img":false},"pbg_comment_info":" No Comments","pbg_excerpt":"We examined the operating principle of analyzers, their types and the subtleties of handling them.","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57570","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57570"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57570\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57751,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57570\/revisions\/57751"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4489"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57570"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57570"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57570"},{"taxonomy":"tag-cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tag-cat?post=57570"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}