{"id":57605,"date":"2025-07-31T04:55:11","date_gmt":"2025-07-31T01:55:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/geochemical-exploration-methods-practical-guide-with-examples\/"},"modified":"2026-05-07T17:58:31","modified_gmt":"2026-05-07T14:58:31","slug":"geochemical-exploration-methods-practical-guide-with-examples","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/geochemical-exploration-methods-practical-guide-with-examples\/","title":{"rendered":"Geochemical Exploration Methods: A Practical Guide with Examples"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Geochemistry is not just taking a sample with a shovel and putting it in a backpack, but the first and one of the most important steps in finding ore objects. The success of further geological exploration &#8211; from drilling to reserve calculation &#8211; depends on how geochemical routes are laid, what samples are taken and how the terms of reference are drawn up.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n<p>Together with Ildar Kalko, geochemist and researcher at Moscow State University, we figure out how to competently approach this stage: what methods work, what samples to take, how to take into account restrictions &#8211; from permafrost to geochemical barriers &#8211; and how to correctly draw up technical specifications in order to obtain not an abstract map, but a real basis for decision-making.<\/p>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Geochemical prospecting for deposits: anomalies and indicators<\/h2>\n\n\n<p>Before talking about geochemical methods for searching for deposits, field work and technical specifications, let\u2019s figure out how geochemistry works in general. Why chemical elements behave differently, how they migrate and accumulate, and what their anomalous abundances can tell us\u2014especially if we&#8217;re looking for gold, copper, uranium, and other minerals.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>It all starts with a simple but important thought for a geochemist: everything is in everything. Any rock, drop of water or lump of soil contains the entire periodic table. The differences are only in the concentration, which we can determine &#8211; this is what the search is based on. If in one place the content of arsenic or copper is ten times higher than in the surrounding background, this is already the minimum signal that can help localize the ore deposit. Such areas are geochemical anomalies.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>The elements do not stand still. Under the influence of water, gas, pressure, temperature, they migrate &#8211; and can settle where the conditions are suitable for this. For example, gold may remain deep in the ore body and not appear on the surface, but arsenic, mercury, antimony, iodine, thallium or tellurium rise higher and become indicators by which geochemists can \u201ccatch the trace\u201d of the deposit.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>It is these indicators that make it possible to detect ore objects that do not reach the surface or are covered by sedimentary rocks. This is how a geochemical map is formed: from tens, hundreds or thousands of samples, geochemists reconstruct a \u201cportrait\u201d of the site &#8211; how the elements are distributed, where they could come from, and whether there is any point in continuing the search.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ris.-3-1.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"768\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" alt=\"Rice. 3\" class=\"wp-image-22498\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ris.-3-1.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ris.-3-1.webp 1024w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ris.-3-1-300x225.webp 300w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ris.-3-1-768x576.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ris.-3-1-600x450.webp 600w\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">For ordinary people it is just a rocky landscape, but for geologists it is metasomatically altered volcanics with quartz debris<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Stages of geochemical prospecting for deposits: from problem statement to result<\/h2>\n\n\n<p>Geochemical prospecting methods are included at the very early stages of geological exploration &#8211; when a company has just received a license, enters a poorly studied area, or is trying to clarify old data. Geochemistry helps to quickly and economically understand whether there are signs of ore objects at the site, and where to look for them next.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>Now let&#8217;s look at how this process works in practice &#8211; from setting the task to specific recommendations in the report.<\/p>\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Planning\u00a0<\/h3>\n\n\n<p>It all starts with the study of geological data: old reports, regional geochemical works, geological and structural maps, drilling and geophysical results, satellite images. The task is what type of minerals may be promising in the selected areas, to determine what useful elements we are interested in (gold, copper, uranium, etc.), what factors (structures, faults, relief features) can influence the migration of elements, in which places the anomalies may be distorted.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>At the same stage, it is important to take into account natural limitations that may affect the quality of geochemical data: for example, volcanic ash, permafrost, glacial deposits. We will return to these topics later in the article.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>Next, specialists select the scale of geochemical survey, depending on the stage of geological exploration:<\/p>\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Regional <\/strong><strong>shooting<\/strong> (1:1,000,000 \u2013 1:200,000) is carried out over large areas, often in remote areas such as the Arctic. It helps in identifying ore fields and large anomalous zones. The sampling density is approximately one sample per 1\u201310 km\u00b2. Regional work can be carried out within the framework of public-private partnerships.\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Exploratory survey<\/strong> (1:100,000 \u2013 1:10,000) is needed to clarify promising areas. It allows you to identify scattering halos based on indicator elements. Density &#8211; tens and hundreds of samples per square kilometer.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Detailed shooting<\/strong> (1:10,000 \u2013 1:2,000) is carried out in compact areas where anomalies are recorded, in conditions of turf or insufficient exposure. The survey is aimed at localizing the ore body and building a model &#8211; here the sample density can reach several hundred per 1 km\u00b2. Detailed surveys are rarely used due to the high cost of analytical work.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n<p>Regulatory documents on regional geochemical work can be found on the websites <a href=\"http:\/\/imgre.ru\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">imgre.ru<\/a> And <a href=\"http:\/\/karpinskyinstitute.ru\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">karpinskyinstitute.ru<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n<p>It is on the basis of these inputs that the <strong>terms of reference (TOR)<\/strong> &#8211; a document that will determine what samples to take, with what density, in what direction and with what method of analysis. A mistake at this stage can lead to a loss of investment: you can take 300 samples over 500 km\u00b2 and not catch a single anomaly.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/5.2.2.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" alt=\"5.2.2\" class=\"wp-image-22499\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/5.2.2-1024x683.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/5.2.2-1024x683.webp 1024w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/5.2.2-300x200.webp 300w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/5.2.2-768x512.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/5.2.2-1536x1025.webp 1536w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/5.2.2-1200x801.webp 1200w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/5.2.2-600x400.webp 600w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/5.2.2.webp 1707w\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Fragments of real technical specifications for geochemists<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Field work: how sampling works<\/h3>\n\n\n<p>After drawing up the technical specifications, comprehensive preparation for field work begins: searching and hiring specialists, transporting equipment and supplies, purchasing food supplies. Then the team goes directly to the work site &#8211; be it the tundra of Chukotka, <a data-id=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/geohimiya-v-polyah-kak-ustroena-rabota-i-chem-ona-vazhna\/\" data-type=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/geohimiya-v-polyah-kak-ustroena-rabota-i-chem-ona-vazhna\/\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">volcanic slopes of Kamchatka<\/a> or the swampy forests of Eastern Siberia.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>On site, geochemists collect samples using a pre-marked grid loaded into a GPS to accurately target the desired locations. The profiles are laid across the strike of the main ore direction, with a distance of 50 to 500 meters between them. If rapid on-site analysis shows anomalies, the network is tightened so as not to miss the ore.<\/p>\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Types of samples: what and where to take<\/h4>\n\n\n<p>The choice of sample type depends on the geological structure of the site, landscape and purpose of the survey. Each type of material \u201ccatches\u201d its own anomalies:<\/p>\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Soils<\/strong> &#8211; the main type of samples for searching for ore objects located close to the surface. They are taken in areas without a thick cover, from the productive layer at a depth of 0.1\u20130.5 m. Upper vegetation (moss, grass) must be removed before sampling &#8211; otherwise the signal will be distorted.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Bottom sediments<\/strong> are used in areas where the surface is covered by thick covers (glaciers and swamps) that interfere with soil testing. Samples are taken from the bottom of streams and small rivers, where water washes away and accumulates small particles of ore minerals. The method is applicable both in areas of hidden primary deposits and when searching for placers. Example: in the alluvial regions of Chukotka, they are used to \u201ccatch\u201d gold washed from destroyed bodies. When interpreting, it is important to consider the direction of flow and possible displacement of the anomalies.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Water (hydrochemical testing)<\/strong> used in geochemical prospecting for deposits of uranium and other dissolved elements.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Plants (biogeochemistry)<\/strong> are especially effective in areas with thick weathering crust. Vegetation accumulates elements from the depths: if traditional methods do not give a signal, \u201cwe look at the flora.\u201d It is important to sample only one species &#8211; for example, birch or sedge &#8211; to avoid distortion.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Rocks (ores)<\/strong> are selected from bedrock outcrops, especially if sulfide mineralization (galena, chalcopyrite, arsenopyrite) or ferruginization is visible. They are widely used as confirmatory samples (pieces, chips) to interpret anomalies.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>What is important when sampling<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n<p>A geochemical sample is not just \u201csand in a bag\u201d. Violation of selection conditions can negate the accuracy of the analysis:<\/p>\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Samples must be homogeneous in composition and fraction.<\/strong> Most often they take eluvial sands (weathering products of bedrock), without vegetation, weighing 300\u2013500 g.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Contamination of samples is unacceptable.<\/strong> Even a wedding ring or a metal instrument with copper can distort the result. Selection is carried out using gloves, and samplers are cleaned after each point.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Fixing coordinates is required.<\/strong> Each sample is recorded in a log, linked by GPS, depth and visual features (color, presence of phenocrysts, rust spots, etc.) are indicated.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/6v2.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" alt=\"6v2\" class=\"wp-image-22500\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/6v2-1024x683.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/6v2-1024x683.webp 1024w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/6v2-300x200.webp 300w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/6v2-768x512.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/6v2-1536x1025.webp 1536w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/6v2-1200x801.webp 1200w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/6v2-600x400.webp 600w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/6v2.webp 1707w\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">The geochemist takes soil samples from the productive layer along the route. Each bag is a sample along the route; there can be from 20 to 100 of these per day. It is important to note the ore zones encountered in the documentation; observation is everything here. Photo by Georgy Dzhedzheya<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Laboratory analysis: how to choose a method and not overpay<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n<p>Once samples are collected, they undergo initial preparation: drying, sifting (usually to &lt;1 mm fraction), packaging and labeling. It is important to exclude contamination: workers should not use contaminating tools, ore samples should be processed separately, it is important that there is no movement from sample to sample through gloves, a sieve, or a measuring tool. All this can distort the results: 1 gram of ore sample per 200 grams of soil is enough to contaminate a geochemical sample.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ris.-7-1.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"696\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" alt=\"Rice. 7\" class=\"wp-image-22502\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ris.-7-1-1024x696.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ris.-7-1-1024x696.webp 1024w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ris.-7-1-300x204.webp 300w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ris.-7-1-768x522.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ris.-7-1-600x408.webp 600w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ris.-7-1.webp 1160w\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Geochemists prepare samples for sending to the laboratory. Photo: Georgiy Dzhedzheya<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<p>Before sending to the laboratory, a test can be performed at the site. <strong>express analysis with <\/strong><strong>using<\/strong><strong> XRF<\/strong> \u2014 portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer. It allows you to quickly check the composition of samples and adjust the sampling network. The main methods of laboratory analysis differ in sensitivity, cost, labor intensity and purposes of application. Below is a table with comments that will help you choose the appropriate method for the task.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Method<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Where is it used?<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Application<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Pros<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Cons<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>XRF (X-ray fluorescence analysis)<\/strong><\/td><td>Field<\/td><td>Express assessment in field conditions, search for indicators (copper, zinc, arsenic)<\/td><td>Fast, cheap, efficient<\/td><td>Low sensitivity to gold, requires dry sample preparation<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>AAS (atomic absorption spectrometry)<\/strong><\/td><td>Laboratory<\/td><td>Determination of the content of individual metals (gold, silver, copper)<\/td><td>High accuracy on target elements<\/td><td>Does not cover the entire spectrum, not suitable for rapid assessment<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>MAES (multiple atomic emission spectrometer)<\/strong><\/td><td>Laboratory<\/td><td>Definition of 20-35 elements<\/td><td>Simple sample preparation, cheap<\/td><td>A number of elements have insufficient sensitivity<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>ICP-OES (Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Spectrometry)<\/strong><\/td><td>Laboratory<\/td><td>Definition of 35+ elements<\/td><td>High precision, wide range<\/td><td>Average cost, suitable for most items<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>ICP-MS (Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry)<\/strong><\/td><td>Laboratory<\/td><td>Confirmation of anomalies, analysis of rare and noble elements<\/td><td>Very accurate, wide range<\/td><td>Expensive, complex sample preparation (hardly soluble minerals)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Assay analysis<\/strong><\/td><td>Laboratory \/ metallurgical sample<\/td><td>Accurate check of precious metal content (gold, silver)<\/td><td>Reliable, recognized in reporting<\/td><td>Long, labor-intensive, does not provide information about satellites<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n<p>There is no need to fire a cannon at sparrows. The method is chosen not according to the principle \u201cwhat is more expensive is better\u201d, but based on the main target elements, what exactly you want to find and at what stage of the search work you are at. In the early stages, XRF or MAES is sufficient to determine satellite elements, while ICP-MS is best left for international reports and confirmations, shares<strong> Ildar Kalko,<\/strong> geochemist, researcher at Moscow State University.<\/p>\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Interpretation and recommendations: what chemical elements tell you<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n<p>When all the samples have been analyzed, interpretation begins &#8211; geochemists build maps of anomalies and scattering halos, evaluate the spatial distribution of indicators and make predictions: where to look for ore, whether to continue exploration or stop. This is not just a table with concentrations, but a reconstruction of the geological history of the site.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>The nature of the anomaly can determine whether the ore body is preserved and at what depth it is. For example, for gold ore hydrothermal systems <strong>mercury anomalies<\/strong> may indicate that the body is already destroyed and located deep, and <strong>cobalt anomalies<\/strong> &#8211; on the contrary, they signal that you went straight to the residual cortex and opened the body. Such nuances allow you to clarify the model of the object and avoid unnecessary drilling costs.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/2-1.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" alt=\"2\" class=\"wp-image-22505\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/2-1-1024x683.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/2-1-1024x683.webp 1024w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/2-1-300x200.webp 300w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/2-1-768x512.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/2-1-1536x1025.webp 1536w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/2-1-1200x801.webp 1200w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/2-1-600x400.webp 600w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/2-1.webp 1707w\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Geochemical models around porphyry copper deposits. Source: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/profile\/Richard-Tosdal\/publication\/325094646_Footprints_The_Hydrothermal_Alteration_and_Geochemical_Dispersion_Around_Porphyry_Copper_Deposits\/links\/62f13b490b37cc34477e99dd\/Footprints-The-Hydrothermal-Alteration-and-Geochemical-Dispersion-Around-Porphyry-Copper-Deposits.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">SEG NEWSLETTER<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<p>Geochemists produce not only maps of element content, but also maps of derivatives &#8211; coefficients of indicator pairs, profile sections, spatial nuclei of anomalies. You can see from them whether it is a core, a tail, or a smeared halo. All this provides the basis for decision making.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>If the signal is shifted, its nature is clarified taking into account the paleorelief, geochemical barriers and weathering history. At one site in Chukotka, the entire anomaly went 100 meters down the slope\u2014without interpretation, it would have been possible to drill past it. Where samples are confirmed by visual features (malachite, sulfides), their interpretation is especially reliable.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>The result is <strong>report<\/strong>, where maps, tables, coordinates of samples, signs on site and recommendations are collected &#8211; whether to thicken the network, where to drill, whether to complete the search. This is not a dry document, but a working tool by which you can move on: to geophysics, ditches, or straight to drilling.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>All geochemical stages are described in detail in the instructions for geochemical prospecting methods from Polymetal &#8211; this is a good document to check and avoid mistakes.<\/p>\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden aria-label=\"Embed of Instructions for geochemical prospecting, Polymetal, 2022 - reasons for creation and purposes of application in practice.\" class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/instrukcziya-po-geohimicheskim-poiskam-polimetall-2022-\u2014-prichiny-sozdaniya-i-czeli-primeneniya-na-praktike.pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" type=\"application\/pdf\"><\/object><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/instrukcziya-po-geohimicheskim-poiskam-polimetall-2022-\u2014-prichiny-sozdaniya-i-czeli-primeneniya-na-praktike.pdf\" id=\"wp-block-file--media-3e24b3ab-bf6b-45f4-9ae4-85415fd094ea\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Instructions for geochemical prospecting, Polymetal, 2022 &#8211; reasons for creation and purposes of application in practice<\/a><a aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-3e24b3ab-bf6b-45f4-9ae4-85415fd094ea\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/instrukcziya-po-geohimicheskim-poiskam-polimetall-2022-\u2014-prichiny-sozdaniya-i-czeli-primeneniya-na-praktike.pdf\">Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>How to build competent interaction with geochemists: from task to result<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n<p>You have received a license or are planning to search for deposits in a new area. It&#8217;s time to order geochemical work. But how to do it right? How not to get lost in tables, samples and coordinates? How to get not just a beautiful map, but data that you can really rely on?<\/p>\n\n\n<p>We have already figured out how geochemical research works, what samples and methods of analysis are available. In order not to repeat ourselves, we have collected all the steps &#8211; from geological analysis to target formation and sampling network &#8211; into a separate <strong>checklist for drawing up technical specifications<\/strong>. It can be <strong>download and use as a working tool<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden aria-label=\"Embed of Checklist How to draw up technical specifications.\" class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/chek-list.pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" type=\"application\/pdf\"><\/object><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/chek-list.pdf\" id=\"wp-block-file--media-6e9f1477-eabb-435b-98d1-8f3460364058\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Checklist How to draw up technical specifications<\/a><a aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-6e9f1477-eabb-435b-98d1-8f3460364058\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/chek-list.pdf\">Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n<p>Now let&#8217;s move on to what does not end up in papers and formats, but determines the success of the work: how to communicate with a geochemist, how to choose a contractor, how to control the work and interpret the results so that they can be used.<\/p>\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>How to choose a contractor: we check not promises, but cases<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n<p>Choosing a contractor is one of the most important stages. Good geochemistry starts not with price, but with experience. The ideal contractor will not just take samples and throw off an Excel file &#8211; he will understand the geology, tell you where to thicken the network, and make informed recommendations.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>Here&#8217;s what&#8217;s important to pay attention to:<\/p>\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Working cases on similar objects<\/strong><strong><br\/><\/strong>Look for projects where similar work has already been carried out &#8211; for example, gold-silver deposits in permafrost conditions. Don&#8217;t limit yourself to general wording: ask for reports, photos, maps &#8211; anything that shows real results.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>We check and don\u2019t take your word for it<\/strong><strong><br\/><\/strong>The website and commercial offer may promise \u201ceverything is fast and cheap.\u201d The reality is different. Talk to former customers, find out how the work went: whether there were any postponements, whether there were enough specialists, how emergency situations were resolved.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Experience and competencies of experts<\/strong><strong><br\/><\/strong>Look at who works on staff: do these people publish, do they speak at conferences, do they have specialized articles. The presence of a professional track is an important indicator that the contractor not only performs, but understands what he is doing.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>A team, not just a leader<\/strong><strong><br\/><\/strong>Find out in advance who exactly will carry out the work: does the contractor have geologists with experience, or will they hire students for the season. At least one third of the performers must have experience in carrying out work in similar conditions. The quality of sampling and the correctness of documentation depend on the selection of the field team.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Willingness to discuss risks and limitations<\/strong><strong><br\/><\/strong>A reliable contractor will not promise a 100% result, but will honestly outline possible limitations: logistics, difficult terrain, the influence of permafrost or ash. This shows a mature approach rather than a desire to \u201csell anything.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>How to monitor the implementation of technical specifications: inclusion instead of a formal report<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n<p>Control of geochemical work is not just a signed schedule or checking a report at the end. Errors and failures begin long before the final deadline. And if you notice them only upon acceptance, it may already be too late: the season is over, no samples have been taken, logistics have failed, the budget has been exhausted.<\/p>\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Work in partnership rather than in a \u201ccontractor can handle it himself\u201d mode<\/strong><strong><br\/><\/strong>Someone on your team should be in constant communication with the geochemists. This is not formal supervision, but full cooperation. You work for one result: quality data.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Join work chats<\/strong><strong><br\/><\/strong> Join the field chat. This is not control for the sake of control, but a way to see the real situation: are there any delays, is it raining, is the gas running out. Not all geochemists can decide for themselves\u2014and the fate of the season may depend on your help.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Follow intermediate results<\/strong><strong><br\/><\/strong> Ask for access to sample preparation protocols &#8211; they show how samples are taken, dried and crushed. Compare rapid analysis data (XRF) with laboratory results (ICP-MS, AAS) &#8211; sharp discrepancies may signal an error at the selection stage.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Ask for visual confirmation<\/strong><strong><br\/><\/strong> Photographic recording of the site, rust zones, malachite, rock with mineralization &#8211; all this will help to understand how geochemists interpret the data on site and whether they confirm the anomalies visually.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Solve problems as they arise<\/strong><strong><br\/><\/strong> A problem noticed in time means saving hundreds of thousands and saving the season. If logistics are interrupted, there is no fuel, or half of the team is sick, you will be in the know and will be able to join the solution while there is a chance to fix everything.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n<p><strong>Control is not verification. This is constant participation.<\/strong> The tighter the communication, the higher the chance that you will get not just a set of points in Excel, but a high-quality geochemical picture for decision-making.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ris.-8.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"742\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" alt=\"Rice. 8\" class=\"wp-image-22507\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ris.-8-1024x742.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ris.-8-1024x742.webp 1024w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ris.-8-300x217.webp 300w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ris.-8-768x556.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ris.-8-600x434.webp 600w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ris.-8.webp 1160w\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">HE. Verbovsky shows young specialists how to perform spot testing. Photo: Georgiy Dzhedzheya<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What to consider as a result and what to do after: how to work with a geochemical report<\/h3>\n\n\n<p>Geochemical work does not end with sampling. The final and most important stage is interpretation and work with the results, on the basis of which strategic decisions are made: continue exploration, thicken the network, drill or close the project.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>What is included in the result of geochemistry:<\/p>\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>anomaly maps for major and satellite elements (e.g. arsenic for gold, selenium for uranium);<\/li>\n\n\n<li>description of the main anomalies with ranking of prospects;<\/li>\n\n\n<li>tables with characteristics of anomalous geochemical fields (element contents, productivity, resources in tons, for example, 50 ppm arsenic, 0.1 ppm gold, gold productivity 10 m2%, predicted resources for category P3)<\/li>\n\n\n<li>description of the resulting ore samples with coordinates, visual signs (malachite, rusty zones, sulfides) and results of near-ore concentrations (for gold more than 1 g\/t, Cu &gt; 0.1%);<\/li>\n\n\n<li>correlation relationships between elements indicating the type of mineralization;<\/li>\n\n\n<li>recommendations for further actions: thickening the network (for example, up to 100\u00d720 m), proposed ditches, drilling along given drilling profiles (indicating depths, angles);<\/li>\n\n\n<li>passport for identified anomalous zones in a standard form with the involvement of a similar object in a similar geological position (during regional work).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n<p>This data helps:<\/p>\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>clarify the boundaries of ore zones;<\/li>\n\n\n<li>assess the degree of erosion of the deposit;<\/li>\n\n\n<li>evaluate the resources of the useful component (category P3).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n<p>Important: don\u2019t push geochemists \u201cby November.\u201d Laboratory tests can take up to several months &#8211; especially when logistics are carried out through remote cities (for example, Khabarovsk or Magadan). If you require a report within a tight deadline that is not tied to the technical cycle, there is a high risk of receiving low-quality maps and \u201craw\u201d data.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>The work doesn&#8217;t end after the report. The geochemist must understand what the drilling has shown. This allows you to:<\/p>\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>calibrate productivity coefficients;<\/li>\n\n\n<li>adjust interpretation models;<\/li>\n\n\n<li>update the approach in neighboring areas;<\/li>\n\n\n<li>determine which proposed criteria worked and which did not.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n<p>This is no longer just \u201cwork according to technical specifications\u201d, but <strong>partnerships, <\/strong>turning geochemistry into an adaptive search and exploration tool.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-gallery has-nested-images columns-default is-cropped wp-block-gallery-1 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/1-1.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" data-id=\"22508\" alt=\"1\" class=\"wp-image-22508\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/1-1-1024x683.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/1-1-1024x683.webp 1024w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/1-1-300x200.webp 300w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/1-1-768x512.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/1-1-1536x1025.webp 1536w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/1-1-1200x801.webp 1200w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/1-1-600x400.webp 600w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/1-1.webp 1707w\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Gold anomalies in scattering fluxes<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/4-2.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"683\" height=\"1024\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 683px) 100vw, 683px\" data-id=\"22509\" alt=\"4\" class=\"wp-image-22509\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/4-2-683x1024.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/4-2-683x1024.webp 683w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/4-2-200x300.webp 200w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/4-2-768x1151.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/4-2-1025x1536.webp 1025w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/4-2-600x899.webp 600w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/4-2.webp 1139w\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">An example of a predictive geochemical map of a gold ore occurrence<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">When geochemistry can deceive: limitations of the method<\/h2>\n\n\n<p>In most cases, geochemistry works clearly &#8211; if the methodology, stages and logic are followed. But nature knows how to confuse: a signal can \u201ctravel\u201d hundreds of meters, dissolve, disguise itself, or give false hope. This does not mean that the method does not work &#8211; there are simply conditions under which geochemical anomalies are interpreted incorrectly.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>Let&#8217;s look at 5 key limitations of the method &#8211; so that you understand in advance where you should be especially careful and what mistakes can be prevented at the planning stage.<\/p>\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Glacial deposits: a signal that travels for kilometers<\/h3>\n\n\n<p>A glacier can drag rocks hundreds of kilometers away. If we don&#8217;t understand that we&#8217;re sampling glacial deposits, we won&#8217;t know where the signal is coming from. In Chukotka, you can dig for clay, thinking that you have found an anomaly, but that the glacier brought the rock from the other end of the region. So, for example, Karelian granite may end up in Moscow. The signal is blurred, and without the history of glaciations, drilling will go nowhere.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n<p>In Canada, till surveying was carried out on glacial deposits, which made it possible to discover more than one deposit. In Chukotka, glacial clays often cover the productive layer, and the signal almost does not pass through it. Sometimes deeper testing helps, but sometimes the useful signal remains buried.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><em>Till survey is a geochemical method in which samples are taken from the upper and lower horizons of bottom moraine (till), sediments left behind by a glacier. Testing allows you to determine how far the material has moved from the source. The method is especially effective in regions with glacial deposits, where traditional soil surveys give blurry results.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/10.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" alt=\"10\" class=\"wp-image-22510\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/10-1024x683.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/10-1024x683.webp 1024w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/10-300x200.webp 300w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/10-768x512.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/10-1536x1025.webp 1536w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/10-1200x801.webp 1200w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/10-600x400.webp 600w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/10.webp 1707w\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">In the Karelo-Kola region, where glacial cover deposits are common, trillium survey is used, which is aimed at identifying small and undisplaced secondary halos in the thin fraction (&lt;0.06-0.1 mm) of the lower horizons of the bottom moraine using modern analysis methods (AAA, ICP-AES, ICP-MS). Source: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tellur.org\/news\/Report.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Tellurium<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Permafrost: clay that \u201cleaves\u201d<\/h3>\n\n\n<p>In areas with permafrost, clays are capable of \u201cflowing\u201d over the surface of frozen rocks. In Chukotka, for example, a geochemical anomaly can shift hundreds of meters from its source. This is especially true on gentle slopes, where lenses of ice are hidden under an apparently stable surface. Layers of clay slide along them, carrying dispersion halos down the slope.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>If you do not take into account the paleorelief and slope, the anomaly will be separated from the source and exploration work will not yield results.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>What to do? Start with the geology of the site and connect geophysics. Magnetic prospecting or electrical prospecting will help \u201ctie\u201d the anomaly to the source. \u201cIn Chukotka, without paleorelief, you simply won\u2019t understand where to dig,\u201d notes Ildar Kalko. Additionally, ore samples will help: malachite or rusty zones will tell you where the ore is really closer to the surface.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>Geochemists take into account the topography and composition of the samples, and in case of dense vegetation, they drill manually above the anomaly and higher to accurately find the ore.<\/p>\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Volcanic Ash: Invisible Noise<\/h3>\n\n\n<p>In Kamchatka, volcanic ash is a thick blanket that literally covers the geochemical signal. Klyuchevskaya Sopka \u201cbangs\u201d &#8211; and the area is covered with fresh ash by 10\u201315 cm. Where is the ore body? It&#8217;s easy to pass by without noticing anything important. On the surface, fresh ash can still be distinguished &#8211; it is light. But over time, it mixes with sedimentary rocks and becomes indistinguishable from eluvium. Moreover, the ash itself contains its own set of chemical elements that can \u201cmuffle\u201d the anomalies associated with the ore. There were areas where geochemistry did not work precisely because of the thick ash layer &#8211; up to three meters.<\/p>\n\n\n<p><strong>What to do?<\/strong><strong><br\/><\/strong>Take samples deeper &#8211; from the underlying rocks, bypassing the ash layer. Or focus on the bottom sediments of rivers and streams &#8211; the signal passes through better there. If you see a white loose layer, do not take a sample from it. On steep slopes, the ash can be washed away, and the chance of catching a signal is higher. But in flat areas where it has been accumulating for centuries, without deep drilling or geophysics it is unlikely that you will be able to see anything.<\/p>\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Geochemical barriers: trap on the slope<\/h3>\n\n\n<p>\u201cLet\u2019s say you\u2019ve tested and tested the slope, then you come to an inflection point where organic matter appears &#8211; and here you have bam: uranium, molybdenum, selenium. You can see anomalies of these elements because they migrate from the oxidizing zone to the reducing zone and are deposited there. There will be an increased content, but this does not mean that you have a molybdenum deposit here.\u201d<br\/><em>Ildar Kalko<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n<p>Geochemical barriers are natural filters that can deceive even an experienced specialist. Under the influence of the environment, elements pass from one form to another and accumulate where conditions are created for this &#8211; not necessarily above the ore body. For example, a reducing environment with organics can \u201ccatch\u201d uranium or selenium, even if the ore itself is out of the way.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>In order not to confuse such an anomaly with a real indicator, it is important to study the geology of the site as a whole. Ore samples help: if there is malachite, arsenopyrite, or ferruginization, this is an argument in favor of the ore. And laboratory analysis (for example, ICP-MS) allows you to distinguish the nature of the signal and eliminate false traces.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/11.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" alt=\"11\" class=\"wp-image-22511\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/11-1024x683.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/11-1024x683.webp 1024w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/11-300x200.webp 300w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/11-768x512.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/11-1536x1025.webp 1536w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/11-1200x801.webp 1200w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/11-600x400.webp 600w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/11.webp 1707w\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">An ore sample with ore mineralization found at the site allows us to speak about the prospects of the site not only based on the results of ordinary lithochemical (soil) survey. (malachite-azurite films over small sulfide impregnations in vein quartz)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Weathering crust: where everything useful has already gone<\/h3>\n\n\n<p>In areas with a thick weathering crust, such as in Australia or West Africa, valuable elements &#8211; gold, copper, uranium &#8211; can be completely washed out from the surface. Under such conditions, classical geochemistry based on soils hardly works: only minor elements like iron and aluminum remain in the samples. There may be no anomalies at the surface at all, although there is still ore deeper.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>The solution is flora analysis. Some plants (for example, birch, sedge, eucalyptus) are able to pull elements from the depths and accumulate them in their tissues. This gives the geochemist a chance to catch a signal. The main thing is to take samples of only one type to avoid distortions.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>In areas with placers, the situation is the opposite: gold may be in sediments, but the bedrock deposit has already been destroyed. The river washed away the gold from the mountain, and the mountain disappeared thousands of years ago. Bottom sediments will show high contents &#8211; but this is a trace of the past, and not a guideline for further prospecting work, much less drilling.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/12-1.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" alt=\"12\" class=\"wp-image-22512\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/12-1-1024x683.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/12-1-1024x683.webp 1024w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/12-1-300x200.webp 300w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/12-1-768x512.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/12-1-1536x1025.webp 1536w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/12-1-1200x801.webp 1200w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/12-1-600x400.webp 600w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/12-1.webp 1707w\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">The river stores traces of gold in bottom sediments, but the original deposit may have been \u201cwashed away\u201d long ago<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Geochemists &#8211; exploration pioneers: why observation is important<\/h2>\n\n\n<p>Geochemistry is not a cheap start to geological exploration. This is the foundation that determines whether you find ore or waste millions. Especially today, when most of the deposits that \u201creach\u201d the surface have already been discovered, and those that are hidden deep remain. The real challenge is to find an uneroded, preserved deposit that has no obvious traces on the surface.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>This requires an integrated approach: geochemistry, geophysics, relief analysis, old geological reports and maps, the ability to notice little things and connect them into the big picture. Sometimes a guess is born not in the laboratory, but at the moment when you stand on a slope and understand: an anomaly is not just a bright spot on the map, there is something behind it.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>\u201cYou walk along a hill, look at your feet, and keep in your head the entire geology of the area. You carefully monitor the degree of change in the rocks. If you are too lazy to hit a rusty stone, you will not notice supergenic copper minerals (malachite or azurite) &#8211; you can pass by the deposit,\u201d<br\/>\u2014 Ildar Kalko<\/p>\n\n\n<p>A geochemist is not just a man with a shovel. He doesn\u2019t just take a sample \u201con a grid\u201d, but reads the landscape like a book: where clay could have shifted, where permafrost hid an anomaly, where ash masked a trace. This observation is the difference between working \u201chead-on\u201d and real searches.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>Have you already encountered geochemistry in projects? Did you order such work, or did you go out into the fields yourself? What were the difficulties, did the method work, did geochemistry help? Share your experience &#8211; it will help others make better decisions.<\/p>\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-right has-small-font-size\"><em>The material was prepared with the support of the Russian Ministry of Education and Science as part of the Decade of Science and Technology<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Geochemistry is not just taking a sample with a shovel and putting it in a backpack, but the first and one of the most important steps in finding ore objects. The success of further geological exploration &#8211; from drilling to reserve calculation &#8211; depends on how geochemical routes are laid, what sampl<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":22497,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"Geochemical Exploration Methods: A Practical Guide with Examples","_seopress_titles_desc":"Learn how to conduct research effectively and avoid common mistakes. Let's talk to geochemist Ildar Kalko","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[560,581],"tags":[602],"tag-cat":[595,596],"class_list":{"0":"post-57605","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-exploration","8":"category-geology","9":"tag-geological-exploration-data-interpretation","10":"tag-cat-exploration","11":"tag-cat-geology-and-geophysics"},"acf":[],"pbg_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/oblozhka.webp",1707,1139,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/oblozhka-150x150.webp",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/oblozhka-300x200.webp",300,200,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/oblozhka-768x512.webp",768,512,true],"large":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/oblozhka-1024x683.webp",1024,683,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/oblozhka-1536x1025.webp",1536,1025,true],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/oblozhka.webp",1707,1139,false],"bricks_large_16x9":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/oblozhka-1200x675.webp",1200,675,true],"bricks_large":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/oblozhka-1200x801.webp",1200,801,true],"bricks_large_square":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/oblozhka-1200x1139.webp",1200,1139,true],"bricks_medium":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/oblozhka-600x400.webp",600,400,true],"bricks_medium_square":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/oblozhka-600x600.webp",600,600,true]},"pbg_author_info":{"display_name":"\u042e\u043b\u0438\u044f \u0424\u0440\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0432\u0430","author_link":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/author\/giulia-nikolaevna\/","author_img":false},"pbg_comment_info":" No Comments","pbg_excerpt":"Geochemistry is not just taking a sample with a shovel and putting it in a backpack, but the first and one of the most important steps in finding ore objects. The success of further geological exploration - from drilling to reserve calculation - depends on how geochemical routes are laid, what sampl","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57605","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57605"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57605\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57623,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57605\/revisions\/57623"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/22497"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57605"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57605"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57605"},{"taxonomy":"tag-cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tag-cat?post=57605"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}