{"id":57728,"date":"2025-01-21T14:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-01-21T11:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/can-a-portable-analyzer-detect-gold-at-a-content-of-1-gram-per-tonne\/"},"modified":"2026-05-07T19:55:26","modified_gmt":"2026-05-07T16:55:26","slug":"can-a-portable-analyzer-detect-gold-at-a-content-of-1-gram-per-tonne","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/can-a-portable-analyzer-detect-gold-at-a-content-of-1-gram-per-tonne\/","title":{"rendered":"Can a Portable Analyzer Detect Gold at a Content of 1 Gram per Tonne?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>There is a stereotype that a portable X-ray fluorescence analyzer determines arbitrarily small concentrations of gold in anything, quickly, simply and cheaply. In advertising you can even hear that it is capable of finding gold with a content of 1 gram per ton. Why this opinion is wrong &#8211; we\u2019ll figure it out together with the head of the Laboratory of X-ray Spectral Analysis Methods Oleg Nabelkin and leading consulting geologist Elena Ryazanova.<\/p>\n\n<div id=\"brxe-dhzhok\" class=\"brxe-container\"><div id=\"brxe-dptqfg\" class=\"brxe-block\"><\/div><div id=\"brxe-rzwpbc\" class=\"brxe-block\"><div id=\"brxe-biaboh\" class=\"brxe-text medium-text\"><p><strong>Article partner:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/pvp-snk.ru\/vanta_m?utm_source=geoconversation.org&amp;utm_medium=article&amp;utm_campaign=ryazanova&amp;utm_content=vantam-geo&amp;utm_term=pvpsnkru\">SNK PVP<\/a>, a supplier of portable X-ray fluorescence analyzers. These instruments are widely used in geology for rapid analysis of ores and rocks in the field.<\/p>\n<p><strong>We will customize a solution for your needs!  <a href=\"https:\/\/pvp-snk.ru\/vanta_m?utm_source=geoconversation.org&amp;utm_medium=article&amp;utm_campaign=ryazanova&amp;utm_content=vantam-geo&amp;utm_term=pvpsnkru\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The analyzer shows a lot of gold<\/h2>\n\n\n<p>Sometimes, when analyzing a sample, a portable analyzer may display 200 grams of gold per tonne. But this is unlikely to be true and here&#8217;s why.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>Gold is a noble metal; in nature it almost does not enter into chemical reactions, therefore it is distributed extremely unevenly among rock minerals: in some places there is a lot of it, and in others there is little. Gold is found in the matrix of the sample, that is, in the aggregate of minerals. The matrix can be light, for example, quartz, or heavy, for example, sulfide. Measurement with the help of a portable analyzer is always superficial: what gets into the window of the device is what it counts. There was a grain of gold about a millimeter in size &#8211; the analyzer showed 200 grams per ton.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-1.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" alt=\"Gold in the rock\" class=\"wp-image-8875\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-1-1024x683.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-1-1024x683.webp 1024w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-1-300x200.webp 300w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-1-768x512.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-1-1536x1025.webp 1536w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-1-1200x801.webp 1200w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-1-600x400.webp 600w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-1.webp 1707w\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">\u201cTo get 2 grams of gold, you need to process 1 ton of ore.\u201d Source of footage and quotes: video <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=e6G6sVgd7D4\">\u201cHow are gold and its deposits formed? Why is it so valuable and how is it mined?<\/a>, channel \u201cThrough the Eyes of a Geologist\u201d<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<p>For profitable development of the deposit, the gold content must be from 0.5 g\/t. Geochemists and prospectors are interested in other contents &#8211; from 0.03\u20130.05 g\/t, since they may indicate industrial reserves of gold at depth. But rather, XRF will confidently find gold with a content of 30 g\/t.<\/p>\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><em>Modern portable analyzers have a sensitivity for gold from 2 to 20 g\/t, depending on the matrix in which it is located.<\/em><\/p>\n<cite>Oleg Nabelkin<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n<p>It happens that when analyzing an empty sample, for example, an aluminum plate, the device shows gold lines in the spectrum. This happens because the filling of the analyzer itself\u2014the parts of the X-ray tube or detector\u2014is gilded.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-video\"><video height=\"720\" style=\"aspect-ratio: 1280 \/ 720;\" width=\"1280\" controls=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-teper-tochno-geohimiki.mp4\"><\/video><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Geochemists getting ready for work<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The analyzer does not show gold<\/h2>\n\n\n<p>Since the concentrations of gold in the ore are low, specialists look for this metal by its satellites &#8211; elements that correlate with it. For example, these are zinc, bismuth, arsenic, antimony. Their concentrations are higher and they are recorded better, but there is a drawback: satellite elements can interfere with the analytical lines of gold and produce noise.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>The noise level depends on the type of matrix. A light quartz matrix consists mainly of silicon and oxygen, which have almost no effect on the signal-to-noise ratio. The heavy sulfide matrix consists mainly of iron, arsenic, copper, zinc, lead, bismuth &#8211; heavy elements that strongly absorb X-rays. It is more difficult for secondary X-ray radiation from gold atoms to escape from such a matrix, which significantly reduces the useful signal from gold.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-2-1.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" alt=\"2\" class=\"wp-image-9353\" src=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-2-1-1024x683.webp\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-2-1-1024x683.webp 1024w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-2-1-300x200.webp 300w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-2-1-768x512.webp 768w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-2-1-1536x1025.webp 1536w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-2-1-1200x801.webp 1200w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-2-1-600x400.webp 600w, https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-2-1.webp 1707w\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Gold \u201csat on the shoulder\u201d of arsenic. Chart provided by Elena Ryazanova<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<p>Using satellite elements, you can derive a correlation between the gold content, for example: a lot of arsenic &#8211; a lot of gold. But there are deposits where such a dependence is absent.<\/p>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How to search for gold with a portable analyzer: simple tips<\/h2>\n\n\n<p>Decide how you plan to look for gold, what opportunities there are for sample preparation and what concentrations of gold you plan to look for &#8211; this affects the choice of equipment, accuracy and speed of analysis.<\/p>\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>To search <strong>by geochemical profile <\/strong>A small budget analyzer that measures without sample preparation is suitable, since, probably, there should be a lot of elements associated with gold in the rock by mass, and they should be easy to register.<\/li>\n\n\n<li>If you intend to measure <strong>in powder<\/strong>This means that the user is willing to spend time on sample preparation, and the accuracy and detection limits will be better.<\/li>\n\n\n<li>If the user does <strong>solid phase extractant <\/strong>(Editor&#8217;s note &#8211; a substance that is added to a sample to increase the concentration of gold), which means that he is ready to sacrifice analysis speed and productivity, but wants to directly measure gold quite accurately and on a portable device.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n<p>It is best to analyze the best prepared sample &#8211; it needs to be well crushed, ground, quartted and mixed to obtain a homogeneous mass.<\/p>\n\n\n<p class=\"has-white-color has-vivid-cyan-blue-to-vivid-purple-gradient-background has-text-color has-background has-link-color wp-elements-d18e8e2a4216b4127ebf297d6c530fa3\">To better understand the operation of the analyzer, take a look at the material \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/portativnyj-rentgenofluoresczentnyj-analizator-instrukcziya-po-primeneniyu\/\">Portable X-ray fluorescence analyzer: instructions for use<\/a>\u00bb.<\/p>\n\n\n<pre class=\"wp-block-preformatted\">We wrote this material with the support of Alexander Chebotarev. You too can help our portal and <a data-id=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/donaty\/\" data-type=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/donaty\/\">make a small donation<\/a>.<\/pre>\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-right\"><em><sub>On the cover there is gold in quartz. Source: Catalog Minerals.ru<\/sub><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There is a stereotype that a portable X-ray fluorescence analyzer determines arbitrarily small concentrations of gold in anything, quickly, simply and cheaply. In advertising you can even hear that it is capable of finding gold with a content of 1 gram per ton. Why this opinion is wrong &#8211; we\u2019ll figu<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":8874,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"Can a Portable Analyzer Detect Gold at a Content of 1 Gram per Tonne?","_seopress_titles_desc":"Can a portable XRF analyzer detect any concentrations of gold at any level? Let's talk to the experts","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[560,581],"tags":[590],"tag-cat":[595,596],"class_list":{"0":"post-57728","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-exploration","8":"category-geology","9":"tag-editorial-choice","10":"tag-cat-exploration","11":"tag-cat-geology-and-geophysics"},"acf":[],"pbg_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-oblozhka.webp",1707,1139,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-oblozhka-150x150.webp",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-oblozhka-300x200.webp",300,200,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-oblozhka-768x512.webp",768,512,true],"large":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-oblozhka-1024x683.webp",1024,683,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-oblozhka-1536x1025.webp",1536,1025,true],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-oblozhka.webp",1707,1139,false],"bricks_large_16x9":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-oblozhka-1200x675.webp",1200,675,true],"bricks_large":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-oblozhka-1200x801.webp",1200,801,true],"bricks_large_square":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-oblozhka-1200x1139.webp",1200,1139,true],"bricks_medium":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-oblozhka-600x400.webp",600,400,true],"bricks_medium_square":["https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/geoconversation.org-1-oblozhka-600x600.webp",600,600,true]},"pbg_author_info":{"display_name":"Elizaveta Akimova","author_link":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/author\/elizaveta\/","author_img":false},"pbg_comment_info":" No Comments","pbg_excerpt":"There is a stereotype that a portable X-ray fluorescence analyzer determines arbitrarily small concentrations of gold in anything, quickly, simply and cheaply. In advertising you can even hear that it is capable of finding gold with a content of 1 gram per ton. Why this opinion is wrong - we\u2019ll figu","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57728","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57728"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57728\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57750,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57728\/revisions\/57750"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8874"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57728"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57728"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57728"},{"taxonomy":"tag-cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoconversation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tag-cat?post=57728"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}